Developed by ![]() ![]() |
Supported by ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Merck Originator
https://www.merck.com/
United States Merck & Co., Inc. is an American multinational pharmaceutical company known as Merck Sharp & Drone (MSD) in territories outside of the USA and Canada. Merck was originally established in 1891, and is headquartered in Rahway, New Jersey. The company is particularly well known for developing and manufacturing biologic therapies, vaccines, medicines and animal health products. |
![]() |
Gilead Sciences Originator
https://www.gilead.com/
United States Gilead Sciences, Inc. is a multinational biopharmaceutical company that develops and manufactures innovative medicines for life-threatening diseases, including anti-viral therapeutics for HIV/AIDS, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C and Covid-19. Headquartered in Foster City, California, Gilead was originally founded in 1987 and is currently listed on both the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ Biotechnology Index. |
Islatravir Chemical Structure
Sourced from DrugBank
Lenacapavir Chemical Structure
Sourced from DrugBank
Islatravir and Lenacapavir Chemical Structure
Composite Adapated from DrugBank
Oral solid form
Oral
Not provided
fixed dose combination of 300 mg lenacapavir + 2 mg islatravir
Not provided
Not provided
investigational doses used: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06630286
Not provided
Not provided
No delivery device
Lenacapavir is commercially manufactured by Gilead Sciences. Several synthetic chemical processes describing the manufacture of islatravir (ISL) have been published. However, these approaches have proved to be complex and highly inefficient, with marked difficulty in controlling 2’-deoxyribonucleoside anomer stereochemistry and the requirement for several protecting-group manipulations. To counter these issues, Merck developed a highly innovative and extraordinarily efficient approach utilising directed evolution to create a novel three-step biocatalytic cascade for ISL synthesis.
Islatravir: EasyMax 102 and 402 equipped with FireStringO2 sensors and the EasySampler 1210 system. A thermal gas flow controller (Aalborg, USA) to monitor and control oxidation air-gas flow to the reactor, with a suitable compressed air-source. Lenacapavir: Stainless steel pharmaceutical reactors, glass-lined reactors, rotary evaporator (rotovap), flash chromatography columns, stainless steel autoclave, cooling bath, silica gel chromatography columns, vacuum distillation apparatus, simulated moving bed chromatography system, Chiralpak columns.
For Islatravir synthesis, the automated lab reactor platforms EasyMax 102 and 402 (Mettler-Toledo AG, AutoChem, Switzerland) were utilised by Merck for reaction scale-up. Although ISL+LEN is currently being evaluated as a fixed-dose oral regimen, future studies may permit LEN to be administered via subcutaneous injection. In this instance, storage of injectable lenacapavir in borosilicate vials is contraindicated due to issues with chemical compatibility. Instead, it is recommended that vials are made from aluminosilicate glass.
Islatravir: 400 MHz Briker AVANCE III and 500MHz Bruker Ultrashield spectrometer (or equivalent) for 1H, 19F, 31P and 13C NMR. An Accurate-Mass Time-of-Flight (TOF) high resolution mass spectrometer. Molecular Devices plate reader Spectra Max Plus for Spectrophotomeric analyses, alongside a Perkin Elmer polarimeter with a PCB 1500 water Peltier system for optical rotation measurements. Lenacapavir: Proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR), High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography (UPLC).
NCT05052996
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05052996
Phase II
Active, not recruiting
Gilead Sciences
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of oral weekly islatravir (ISL) in combination with lenacapavir (LEN) in virologically suppressed people with HIV (PWH) at Week 24.
Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Islatravir in Combination With Lenacapavir in Virologically Suppressed People With HIV
Intervention 1
Intervention 2
Not provided
Anticipated Start Date
Not provided
Actual Start Date
2021-10-05
Anticipated Date of Last Follow-up
2024-09-17
Estimated Primary Completion Date
Not provided
Estimated Completion Date
2027-11-01
Actual Primary Completion Date
2023-12-19
Actual Completion Date
Not provided
Age Cohort
Genders
Accepts pregnant individuals
No
Accepts lactating individuals
No
Accepts healthy individuals
No
Key Inclusion Criteria: - Received bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) for ≥ 24 weeks at screening. - Documented plasma human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) ribonucleic acid (RNA) < 50 copies/mL (or undetectable HIV-1 RNA level according to the local assay being used if the limit of detection is ≥ 50 copies/mL) for ≥ 24 weeks before and at screening. - Plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at screening. Key Exclusion Criteria: * History of prior virologic failure while receiving treatment for HIV-1. * Prior use of, or exposure to, islatravir (ISL) or lenacapavir (LEN). * Active, serious infections requiring parenteral therapy < 30 days before randomization.
Interventional (clinical trial)
142
Randomized
Parallel Assignment
Not provided
Open label
None (Open Label)
Treatment
NCT06630286
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06630286
Phase III
Recruiting
Gilead Sciences
The goal of this clinical study is to learn about the safety and efficacy of switching to once weekly tablet of islatravir/lenacapavir (ISL/LEN) regimen versus continuing standard treatment of bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) in people with human immunodeficiency virus (PWH) who are virologically suppressed (HIV-1 RNA levels \< 50 copies/mL) on B/F/TAF for ≥ 6 months prior to screening. The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of switching to oral weekly ISL/LEN tablet regimen versus continuing B/F/TAF in virologically suppressed PWH at Week 48.
Study to Compare an Oral Weekly Islatravir/Lenacapavir Regimen With Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide in Virologically Suppressed People With HIV-1
Intervention 1
Intervention 2
Not provided
Anticipated Start Date
Not provided
Actual Start Date
2024-10-09
Anticipated Date of Last Follow-up
2024-11-13
Estimated Primary Completion Date
2026-06-01
Estimated Completion Date
2030-08-01
Actual Primary Completion Date
Not provided
Actual Completion Date
Not provided
Age Cohort
Genders
Accepts pregnant individuals
Unspecified
Accepts lactating individuals
Unspecified
Accepts healthy individuals
No
Key Inclusion Criteria: - HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL for ≥ 6 months before screening, as documented by: 1. One HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL immediately preceding the 24 week period prior to screening. 2. Within 24 weeks prior to screening, if HIV-1 RNA results are available, all levels must be < 50 copies/mL. 3. During the 6 to 12 months period prior to screening, transient detectable viremia ≥ 50 copies/mL is acceptable ("blip"), as long as it is not confirmed on 2 consecutive visits. - Plasma HIV-1 RNA levels < 50 copies/mL at screening. - Individuals are receiving B/F/TAF for ≥ 6 months prior to screening and willing to continue until Day 1. - Individuals assigned female at birth and of childbearing potential who engage in heterosexual intercourse must agree to use contraception.
Interventional (clinical trial)
600
Randomized
Parallel Assignment
Not provided
Double-blind masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Treatment
NCT06630299
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06630299
Phase III
Recruiting
Gilead Sciences
The goal of this clinical study is to learn more about the safety and efficacy of switching to a once weekly tablet of islatravir/lenacapavir (ISL/LEN) regimen versus continuing standard of care treatment in people with human immunodeficiency virus (PWH) who are virologically suppressed (HIV-1 RNA levels \< 50 copies/mL) on a stable standard of care regimen for ≥ 6 months prior to screening. The standard of care includes 2 or 3 medicines, antiretroviral agents (ARVs). The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of switching to oral weekly ISL/LEN tablet regimen versus continuing standard of care in virologically suppressed PWH at Week 48.
Study to Compare an Oral Weekly Islatravir/Lenacapavir Regimen With Standard of Care in Virologically Suppressed People With HIV-1
Intervention 1
Intervention 2
Not provided
Anticipated Start Date
Not provided
Actual Start Date
2024-10-08
Anticipated Date of Last Follow-up
2024-10-30
Estimated Primary Completion Date
2027-06-01
Estimated Completion Date
2030-08-01
Actual Primary Completion Date
Not provided
Actual Completion Date
Not provided
Age Cohort
Genders
Accepts pregnant individuals
Unspecified
Accepts lactating individuals
Unspecified
Accepts healthy individuals
No
Key Inclusion Criteria: - HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL for ≥ 6 months before screening, as documented by: 1. One HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL immediately preceding the 24 weeks period prior to screening. 2. Within 24 weeks prior to screening, if HIV-1 RNA results are available, all levels must be < 50 copies/mL. 3. During the 6 to 12 months period prior to screening, transient detectable viremia ≥ 50 copies/mL is acceptable ("blip") as long as it is not confirmed on 2 consecutive visits. - Plasma HIV-1 RNA levels < 50 copies/mL at screening. - Are receiving guideline-recommended standard of care treatment such as International Antiviral Society (IAS), Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), European AIDS Clinical Society (EACS) consisting of 2 or 3 ARVs for ≥ 6 months.
Interventional (clinical trial)
600
Randomized
Parallel Assignment
Not provided
Open label
None (Open Label)
Treatment
No proprietary excipient used
No novel excipient or existing excipient used
No residual solvent used
There are either no relevant patents or these were not yet submitted to LAPaL
There are no publication
No documents were uploaded
|
Collaborate for developmentConsider on a case by case basis, collaborating on developing long acting products with potential significant public health impact, especially for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), utilising the referred to long-acting technology Not provided |
|
Share technical information for match-making assessmentProvide necessary technical information to a potential partner, under confidentiality agreement, to enable preliminary assessment of whether specific medicines of public health importance in LMICs might be compatible with the referred to long-acting technology to achieve a public health benefit Not provided |
|
Work with MPP to expand access in LMICsIn the event that a product using the referred to long-acting technology is successfully developed, the technology IP holder(s) will work with the Medicines Patent Pool towards putting in place the most appropriate strategy for timely and affordable access in low and middle-income countries, including through licensing Not provided |
Not provided