Pharmacokinetics and safety of once-yearly lenacapavir: a phase 1, open-label study. Jogiraju, Vamshi et al. The Lancet, Volume 405, Issue 10485, 1147 - 1154
Background
Long-acting antiretrovirals can address barriers to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), such as stigma and adherence. In two phase 3 trials, twice-yearly subcutaneous lenacapavir was safe and highly efficacious for PrEP in diverse populations. Furthering long-acting PrEP efforts, this study assessed the pharmacokinetics and safety of two once-yearly intramuscular lenacapavir formulations.
Methods
This phase 1, open-label study in participants aged 18–55 years without HIV evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of two lenacapavir free acid formulations administered by ventrogluteal intramuscular injection as a single 5000 mg dose (formulation 1 with 5% w/w ethanol, formulation 2 with 10% w/w ethanol). Pharmacokinetic samples were collected at prespecified timepoints up to 56 weeks. Lenacapavir plasma concentrations were measured with a validated liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method and summarised with non-compartmental analysis. Pharmacokinetic parameters evaluated included the area under the concentration–time curve for the once-yearly dosing interval calculated from days 1 to 365 (AUCdays 1–365), peak plasma concentration, time to reach peak plasma concentration, and trough concentration (Ctrough). Plasma concentration data from phase 3 studies of twice-yearly subcutaneous lenacapavir (PURPOSE 1 and PURPOSE 2) were pooled for comparison with once-yearly intramuscular lenacapavir formulations. Safety and tolerability, including participant-reported pain scores, were assessed.
Findings
20 participants received lenacapavir formulation 1 and 20 received lenacapavir formulation 2. For estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters, sample size varied over time with at least 13 participants (formulation 1) and at least 19 participants (formulation 2) due to early discontinuations for reasons unrelated to the study drug. Following administration of intramuscular lenacapavir, concentrations increased rapidly, and median time to maximum concentration was 84·1 days (IQR 56·1–112·0) for formulation 1 and 69·9 days (55·3–105·5) for formulation 2. The highest median concentration of once-yearly intramuscular lenacapavir (247·0 ng/mL [IQR 184·0–346·0] for formulation 1, 336·0 ng/mL [233·5–474·3] for formulation 2) remained above the highest median twice-yearly subcutaneous lenacapavir concentration (67·3 ng/mL [46·8–91·4]). Median Ctrough at the end of 52 weeks for formulation 1 was 57·0 ng/mL (IQR 49·9–72·4) and for formulation 2 was 65·6 ng/mL (41·8–87·1), exceeding the median twice-yearly subcutaneous lenacapavir Ctrough of 23·4 ng/mL (15·7–34·3) at the end of 26 weeks. Median AUCdays 1–365 for formulation 1 was 1011·1 h*μg/mL (IQR 881·0–1490·2) and for formulation 2 was 1274·0 h*μg/mL (1177·3–1704·8). Adverse events were mostly grade 1 or 2. The most common was injection-site pain (16 [80%] participants given formulation 1, 15 [75%] given formulation 2), which was generally mild, resolved within 1 week, and was substantially reduced by pretreatment with ice.
Interpretation
Following administration of once-yearly intramuscular lenacapavir, median plasma concentrations exceeded those associated with efficacy in phase 3 studies of twice-yearly subcutaneous lenacapavir for PrEP for at least 56 weeks. Both formulations were safe and well tolerated. These data show the potential for biomedical HIV prevention with a once-yearly dosing interval.
